Race, religion, nationality and gender are all ideological/identity forming forces that contribute to the segregation and annihilation of humanity. Subsequently the human condition could easily be defined by division and lack: the division into anti-human identities and the continuous yearning for what is lacking that stimulates and/or is stimulated from that division. Division and lack creates a very vicious circle. The consciousness of lack engenders an identity forming sense of “difference from”. This itself creates an anchoring in the identity defined by lack that searches for more differences and more lacks to set it further apart.
But can we call such a continually dividing cycle “the human condition”? Isn’t it rather the anti-human condition? Anti-human: that which pulls us away from our condition as a species. That which pulls us away from our authentic human condition.
If this is so then the vital human question must be, how can we escape this vicious scarring circle of continual separation from ourselves? How can we heal the divisions between us and reconstruct a true sense of belonging to the species we are?
We are not talking about a complete destruction of differences. Paradoxically, difference has to lie at the base of the human condition – but what we want to dispute is the way we perceive necessary division and lack. The great Identity factors (nationality, race … etc.) need to be de-valuated in order to allow humanity-unifying principles to breathe and flourish. Nationality, language, class, etc., are principal nodal points, fixing meaning in the chain of our perception of reality. But what this creates is a growing away from the whole, when it should be a growing within the whole. The growing within would be an elevator of real human affirmation, rather than our current stepping-stone ladder, running away and leaving each one of us on a tenuous limb away from the centre which is the individual as a human being.
By stripping away the anti-human nodal points, we achieve a more transparent beginning for each individual. Each one of us is essentially born into-the-world as a part of the human species, and that human, Sapiens identity should not be removed from any human being. As long as this condition is established as a first priority, even a later re-establishment of the nodes will not be as divisive as it is now. Being named and obtaining a language to communicate with will lose their divisive qualities and instead be appreciated as an element of variegation within the whole. Languages become things that need to be acquired rather than a means of distinguishing your difference from the rest of humanity.
But where the nodes of languages may be seen as an enriching element in the human experience other nodes may need to be radically nullified – or even completely eradicated if they inherently contradict human values.
Individual identity usually moves through the nodes of name, sex, family, neighbourhood, region, society, state, religion – or lack of it – economic class, politics, clubs, and so on. But human identity, on the other hand, only needs a recognition and empathy with other humans. As a homo sapiens, humans need to know things. As a homo habilis, we need to be technological and creative, as well as needing to ensure basic needs for survival: shelter, food and drink, protection against extreme climate conditions, etc.. Contact and co-operation with other human beings should be stressed. As should communication and cohabitation. Cooperation is creative. Technological and problem solving projects are desirable. Division and lack are not.
Humanitarianism, or Sapienism, should be a process of resolving divisions and problems caused by lack, it should not be a means of exploiting it. The vicious circle of division and lack has to be broken out of if we are ever to save ourselves from the destructive self-ingurgitating effects of the maelstrom it creates.